Record
Court opinion
1990-06-01
CourtListener (Free Law Project), text of the opinion
United States v. International Brotherhood of Teamsters, 905 F.2d 610 (2d Cir. 1990)
The Second Circuit affirmed orders sustaining the Independent Administrator's disciplinary authority under the Teamsters Consent Decree, and rejected the argument that a General Executive Board resolution bound the Administrator.
- Date
- 1990-06-01
- Kind
- court-opinion
- Retrieved
- 2026-10-12
- Docket
- Dockets 89-6248, 89-6250, 90-6136, 90-6138, 90-6142 (2d Cir.); 905 F.2d 610
- Rights
- Opinion of a United States court. Works of the federal judiciary are in the public domain in the United States (17 U.S.C. § 105). The text was read on CourtListener (Free Law Project).
United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit, argued 30 April 1990 and decided 1 June 1990.
The appeals came from the district court’s orders, among them 725 F. Supp. 162, sustaining the disciplinary authority of the Independent Administrator, Frederick B. Lacey, over Harold Friedman, the union’s eleventh vice president, and Anthony Hughes. The union had argued that a resolution of its General Executive Board interpreting the union constitution bound the Administrator. The court disagreed and affirmed.
The ruling concerns the reach of the Consent Decree. It is not a ruling on the merits of the disciplinary charges.